[Supervisor-users] [Fwd: Re: FastCGI - socket not being created with correct user]

[Roger Hoover]

Thanks, Mike.  Let me know if you want to me to do any refactoring but I
tend to agree that it's low priority.

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Mike Naberezny <mike at maintainable.com>wrote:

> Hi Roger,
>
>
> On 11/24/09 12:07 PM, Roger Hoover wrote:
>
>> Thanks for offering to make the changes.  I certainly don't mind if you
>> want to do it.  I imagine you're very busy, though.  Let me know if you
>> have the time and desire.  Otherwise, I can do it.
>>
>
> I'll do as you suggest and put a conditional around them so we can get the
> next release out.
>
> This is low priority so I will add a note to the TODO list about making
> those tests run under 2.3 and I will take care of it eventually.  There are
> some issues I should fix ahead of this but I'm happy to do it.
>
>
>  So, do you want to avoid using mock all together or can we just avoid
>> using the decorator stuff?
>>
>
> I like the mock package.  Compatibility with 2.3 is the only issue.  If we
> get it to run under 2.3 then I think it's fine.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> --
> Mike Naberezny
> Maintainable Software
> http://maintainable.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.supervisord.org/pipermail/supervisor-users/attachments/20091208/7d419589/attachment.htm